https://network-switch.com/pages/about-us
Quick take
- 10G is still common for legacy access and cost-sensitive edge links, but it can become a scaling bottleneck in modern racks.
- 25G became the “default” server-access speed in many data centers because it delivers a big jump in bandwidth per port with a clean operational model; IEEE 802.3by was approved June 30, 2016.
- 40G worked well for its era, but its typical lane/cabling patterns can be less efficient than 25G+ designs at scale.
- 50G is the “higher per-link bandwidth” step and a key building block for newer generations; IEEE 802.3cd was approved December 5, 2018.
- 100G is a mature backbone/uplink baseline across modern fabrics; IEEE 802.3ba was approved in June 2010.
If you remember one rule: 25G and 50G are often access/building blocks; 100G is the common aggregation tier; 40G is increasingly transitional/legacy.
Over the past decade, 10G and 40G technologies have dominated large parts of the Ethernet market.
However, as bandwidth demand rises (cloud, storage, east–west traffic, virtualization), 25G/50G/100G have drawn increasing attention because they offer more efficient paths to higher throughput-especially in data centers.
Below, we introduce these technologies and how they relate, while also placing them in the practical context of 10G and 40G.
25G technology
The 25G Ethernet standard was created with cloud data center server connectivity in mind. The IEEE P802.3by 25 Gb/s Ethernet Task Force completed with approval of IEEE Std 802.3by-2016 on 30 June 2016.
A major advantage of 25G is how well it fits modern high-speed electrical design: it makes efficient use of SerDes lanes (serializer/deserializer channels), allowing more throughput per port without multiplying the number of channels and pins required. In practice, that translates to higher port density and lower cost per delivered bit in many access-layer designs.
10G vs 25G vs 40G
Modern switch and NIC architectures are tightly linked to SerDes capabilities. As SerDes generations advanced, 25G-per-lane became a commercially attractive option-changing the cost/benefit picture versus older 10G and 40G approaches.
10G vs 25G
For the same “one-lane” mindset, 25G delivers far more throughput per port than 10G, making it a straightforward way to scale server access bandwidth while keeping operations simple. In many real upgrades, teams also like that the access layer can evolve incrementally (rack by rack) without a full network redesign.
40G vs 25G
Historically, 40G commonly relied on combining multiple lower-speed lanes. That works, but it can reduce port density and, depending on the optical/cabling approach, introduce additional cabling complexity. By comparison, 25G’s single-lane-per-port approach often makes it easier to build dense access layers and cleanly aggregate upstream.
50G technology
With 25G maturing and workloads continuing to grow, the industry naturally pushed for higher per-link speeds. The IEEE P802.3cd Task Force completed with approval of IEEE Std 802.3cd-2018 on December 5, 2018.
You’ll often see 50G discussed alongside newer signaling approaches (commonly PAM4 in many implementations) because it enables higher effective bandwidth per lane. The practical result is that 50G can deliver more bandwidth per link than 25G-often reducing the number of physical links you need for the same total capacity.
One common design picture is 100G ToR uplinks feeding 50G server-facing links during a transition period: when server NIC bandwidth is rising but the fabric is still standardized around 100G aggregation.
Real-world note: higher-speed links generally tighten signal-integrity margins. As speeds rise, consistent cabling/optics quality and platform validation matter more-not because “it won’t link,” but because intermittent errors and edge-margin behavior become the real risk.
100G technology
The work of the P802.3ba 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet Task Force completed with approval of IEEE Std 802.3ba-2010 at the June 2010 IEEE Standards Board meeting.
Since then, 100G has steadily expanded and matured across multiple PHY options and deployment models. In modern networks, 100G continues to replace 40G in many roles because:
- the ecosystem is mature (platform support, optics, operational best practices)
- it fits naturally as a fabric/uplink tier
- it provides a clean stepping point toward higher generations
In transport scenarios, 100G is also widely associated with DWDM-based approaches for longer distances and high-capacity optical transmission-useful for metro networks and data center interconnect planning.
What is the relationship between 25G/50G/100G?
Before 25G and 50G, many upgrades followed 10G → 40G → 100G, but that path can be inefficient and expensive-especially when you scale port count and cabling.
In modern cloud data centers, 25G/50G/100G are often used together as a more efficient ladder:
- 25G serves as a common server-access building block
- 50G increases per-link bandwidth and aligns with newer generations
- 100G is the most common aggregation “meeting point” in leaf–spine uplinks and inter-switch connectivity
In practice, combining these tiers helps reduce unit bandwidth cost by making better use of switch ports while laying a cleaner foundation for the next upgrades (200G/400G and beyond).
Conclusion
Today’s most practical Ethernet speed vocabulary in data centers is 10G / 25G / 40G / 50G / 100G-but their roles are not equal. 10G and 40G still exist, yet the modern upgrade ladder increasingly centers on 25G for access, 50G for higher per-link growth, and 100G as the stable aggregation baseline.
From a standards perspective:
- 25G: IEEE 802.3by-2016 (approved June 30, 2016)
- 50G: IEEE 802.3cd-2018 (approved Dec 5, 2018)
- 100G: IEEE 802.3ba-2010 (approved June 2010)
As demand keeps rising, Ethernet will keep evolving-but these tiers will remain the backbone of real deployments because they map well to phased upgrades, operational simplicity, and practical cost-per-bit.
Did this article help you or not? Tell us on Facebook and LinkedIn . We’d love to hear from you!
