Every device on your network needs an IP address. You can either assign it manually (Static IP) or let the network hand it out automatically (DHCP). The right choice affects deployment speed, troubleshooting, security, remote access, and long-term scale.
This guide gives you a clean, table-driven comparison, practical scenarios, and security best practices (DHCP Snooping, IP Source Guard, DAI). We also map the FS.com switch examples to Cisco / Huawei ady-to-buy version.

TL;DR - Pick This, Not That
If you need… | Pick | Why |
Fast rollouts, lots of endpoints, minimal touch | DHCP | Automated addresses + options (gateway, DNS); leases avoid conflicts; perfect for offices/Wi-Fi/IoT. |
Stable, predictable address for a critical service | Static IP or DHCP reservation | Fixed identity for servers, printers, controllers, VPN endpoints. Reservations keep control in DHCP. |
Tighter L2 security on access ports | DHCP with Snooping + IP Source Guard | Stop rogue servers; bind IP–MAC–port; block spoofing with Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI). |
Public, never-changing address for inbound access | Static Public IP (ISP) | Clean DNS, simpler site-to-site; Dynamic DNS is a workaround when you only have dynamic. |
Modern best practice: Use DHCP for almost everything. For devices that must not change address, create DHCP reservations (fixed IPs served by DHCP). Keep pure manual statics for special/isolated cases.
Quick Primer: What is IP?
IP is the Internet’s addressing system. IPv4 uses dotted-quads (e.g., 192.0.2.10/24); IPv6 uses hex (e.g., 2001:db8::10/64).
DHCP (v4/v6) and Static IP are assignment strategies, not different protocols for moving data.
What is a Static IP?
A manually configured, non-changing address on the device (or a static public IP from your ISP).
Pros: deterministic addressing, easy ACL/NAT rules, consistent remote access.
Cons: manual work, risk of conflicts, harder at scale, easier to fingerprint/target if exposed.
Good fits: servers, appliances (firewalls, PBX), printers, management ports, VPN headends.

What is DHCP?
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol assigns addresses and network options automatically (DORA: Discover → Offer → Request → Ack). It prevents conflicts and reuses addresses via leases.
Pros: near-zero touch, fewer typos, quick moves/adds/changes, great for large fleets and guest/IoT.
Cons: rogue servers and spoofed replies are possible on unsecured networks; address changes complicate some “dial-in” use cases (use reservations or Dynamic DNS).

Side-by-Side: DHCP vs Static IP
Criterion | DHCP | Static IP (manual) |
Configuration | Zero/low touch via scopes & options | Per-device manual setup |
Scale & Flexibility | Excellent for large/variable fleets | Becomes labor-intensive as devices grow |
Change Control | Centralized (server) | Decentralized (every endpoint) |
Conflict Risk | Very low (server tracks leases) | Higher if IPs are reused or mistyped |
Security | Needs Snooping/DAI/Source Guard on access | Predictable targets if exposed; precise ACLs possible |
Remote Access | Use reservations or Dynamic DNS | Simple—address never changes |
Cost/Time | Lowest OPEX for onboarding | Higher OPEX (manual work, truck rolls) |
Choosing Between DHCP and Static IP
- Environment size & churnMany endpoints/guest/IoT? → DHCP. Few, critical nodes? → Static or DHCP reservations.
- Many endpoints/guest/IoT? → DHCP.
- Few, critical nodes? → Static or DHCP reservations.
- Device roleServers, controllers, printers, cameras, VoIP gateways → reservations/static. User devices, APs, STBs, guest/IoT → DHCP.
- Servers, controllers, printers, cameras, VoIP gateways → reservations/static.
- User devices, APs, STBs, guest/IoT → DHCP.
- Security postureEnforce DHCP Snooping + IP Source Guard + DAI; trust only uplinks to the real DHCP server.
- Enforce DHCP Snooping + IP Source Guard + DAI; trust only uplinks to the real DHCP server.
- Remote access & DNSNeed stable inbound reachability? Use static public IP or Dynamic DNS if ISP is dynamic.
- Need stable inbound reachability? Use static public IP or Dynamic DNS if ISP is dynamic.
- IPv6 noteDecide between SLAAC, DHCPv6, or SLAAC + DHCPv6 (stateless) according to your identity and DNS needs.
- Decide between SLAAC, DHCPv6, or SLAAC + DHCPv6 (stateless) according to your identity and DNS needs.
Security
Make DHCP Safe on Access Networks
Enable these on your access switches:
Control | Purpose | What it checks |
DHCP Snooping | Blocks rogue DHCP servers | Allows DHCP Offers only from trusted uplink ports |
IP Source Guard | Stops IP/MAC spoofing | Permits traffic only if IP–MAC–port matches snooping bindings |
Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI) | Prevents ARP poisoning | Validates ARP against snooping table |
These features are widely supported on Cisco Catalyst, Huawei CloudEngine, and Ruijie RG series switches. Check your exact model/OS for commands and license requirements.
Equivalent Portfolios
Model names are examples to guide selection; confirm exact optics/uplink modules and licensing with your reseller.
Reseller example (for reference) | Cisco (example models) | Huawei (example models) | Ruijie (example models) | Notes |
48×1G RJ-45 + 4×10G SFP+ uplinks | C9200L-48T-4X / C9300-48T + NM | CloudEngine S5735-S48T4X-A | RG-S5750-48GT4XS | All support DHCP Snooping on access ports. |
24×1G RJ-45 + 4 combo (RJ-45/SFP) | C9200L-24T-4G (nearest functional) | S5720/S5735 24T + combo uplinks | RG-S2910-24GT4SFP | “Combo” = either copper or SFP per port; exact combos vary by SKU. |
48×1G RJ-45 + 4×25G SFP28 & 2×100G QSFP28 uplinks | C9300X-48T + C9300X-NM-2C (2×100G or 4×25G) | S6730-H series (various 25/100G uplink SKUs) | RG-S6510-48GT + 25/100G uplinks | Verify simultaneous 25G+100G support per module/backplane. |
Practical Scenarios
Scenario | Recommended Addressing | Why |
Corporate office with frequent adds/moves | DHCP for clients, reservations for printers/APs | Fast onboarding, predictable key nodes |
Data center mgmt network | Reservations/static for management planes; DHCP for jump hosts | Deterministic access + easy client ops |
Branch with limited IT | DHCP everywhere, a few reservations | Easy to deploy/replace gear |
Remote access/VPN headend | Static public IP (or DDNS) | Stable endpoint for tunnels and DNS |
FAQs
Q1: Is static IP “more secure”?
A: Not by itself. Security comes from segmentation, ACLs, auth, and inspection. Static addresses are simply predictable.
Q2: Can I mix DHCP and static on the same subnet?
A: Yes, just carve a static range outside the DHCP scope and document it.
Q3: What’s better than manual statics?
A: DHCP reservations: the device keeps a fixed IP, but config and auditing live centrally.
Conclusion
For most networks in 2025, the winning pattern is DHCP by default + reservations for anything that must stay put, wrapped with DHCP Snooping, IP Source Guard, and DAI on access ports. Keep static public IPs (or DDNS) for services that must be reachable from the Internet. This approach delivers low OPEX, clean audits, and fewer late-night IP conflicts.
Did this article help you or not? Tell us on Facebook and LinkedIn . We’d love to hear from you!