https://network-switch.com/pages/about-us
Introduction
As data centers and enterprise networks continue scaling toward 400G, 800G, and beyond, the choice of pluggable form factor has a direct impact on signal integrity, thermal management, density, and long-term scalability.
While QSFP-DD remains common, the OSFP (Octal Small Form-Factor Pluggable) has emerged as a strong contender, designed from the ground up for high-power, high-speed applications such as AI training clusters, HPC fabrics, and 800G Ethernet switching.
This article unpacks what the OSFP connector is, how it differs from QSFP-DD and other form factors, what engineering challenges it solves, and where it fits into modern networks.
Quick View of OSFP Connectors
What is OSFP?
The OSFP (Octal Small Form-Factor Pluggable) is a pluggable transceiver form factor designed to support 8 electrical lanes, each carrying high-speed signals.
- OSFP-400G: 8 × 50G PAM4 = 400G.
- OSFP-800G: 8 × 100G PAM4 = 800G.
- Future-ready for 1.6T (8 × 200G) signaling.
OSFP modules are slightly larger than QSFP-DD modules, but this size increase allows for better heat dissipation and higher power envelopes (up to ~16 W), making them ideal for next-generation optics and DAC/AOC solutions.
OSFP Generations and Speeds
Generations by Lane Rate
| OSFP Generation | Lane Signaling | Modulation | Total Bandwidth | Typical Application |
| OSFP-200G | 8 × 25G NRZ | NRZ | 200 Gbps | Early test systems, legacy |
| OSFP-400G | 8 × 50G PAM4 | PAM4 | 400 Gbps | Leaf–spine 400G Ethernet |
| OSFP-800G | 8 × 100G PAM4 | PAM4 | 800 Gbps | AI clusters, hyperscale fabrics |
| OSFP-1.6T (future) | 8 × 200G PAM4 | PAM4/Coherent | 1.6 Tbps | Next-gen data centers |
OSFP vs Other Form Factors
While QSFP-DD dominates 400G ecosystems, OSFP was designed with thermal headroom and scalability in mind.
OSFP vs QSFP-DD vs QSFP28 vs CFP8
| Attribute | OSFP | QSFP-DD | QSFP28 | CFP8 |
| Max rate | 400G / 800G | 400G / 800G | 100G | 400G |
| Size | Slightly larger | Slightly smaller | Smallest | Very large |
| Power envelope | High (~16 W) | Medium (~12 W) | Low (~4–5 W) | Very high (~24 W) |
| Thermal design | Excellent (heat sink integration) | Moderate | Limited | Moderate |
| Port density (1RU) | ~32–36 | ~36–40 | ~72+ | ~16 |
| Compatibility | Not plug-compatible with QSFP-DD | Backward to QSFP28 | Widely deployed | Mostly legacy |
Key difference: OSFP is not physically compatible with QSFP-DD ports. They may interoperate optically/electrically if both run the same Ethernet standard, but the cages are different.
Components and Design
An OSFP connector system consists of:
- OSFP module: the pluggable transceiver (optical or copper).
- Connector and contacts: ~60 high-speed electrical contacts per port.
- OSFP cage: the housing on the switch or NIC that holds and aligns the module.
- Heat sinks: integrated or external, critical for thermal performance.
- Latch and EMI springs: ensure secure mechanical retention and EMI suppression.
Signal Integrity Challenges
High-speed 112G PAM4 lanes used in OSFP modules introduce new engineering challenges.
- Insertion loss (IL): must be minimized across connector and PCB routing.
- Return loss (RL): impedance mismatches cause reflections.
- Crosstalk: adjacent high-speed lanes can interfere with each other.
- EMI/RFI: external interference affects sensitive PAM4 signaling.
OSFP Design Solutions
- Controlled impedance (≈26 Ω) for high-speed contacts.
- Differential pair routing for noise rejection.
- Shielding and optimized contact geometry to reduce crosstalk.
- Low insertion loss (<1 dB) connectors with consistent return loss performance.
Thermal Considerations
As OSFP modules can consume 12–16 W (400G/800G optics), cages and connectors must support advanced thermal strategies:
- Integrated heat sinks: attached directly to the module body.
- Optimized airflow: front-to-back cooling in high-density chassis.
- Thermal interface materials (TIMs): improve heat transfer.
- Temperature monitoring sensors: provide feedback to system controllers.
Engineering practice: In 1RU switches populated with 32+ OSFP ports, airflow and fan design are as critical as connector performance.
Cable Assemblies and Deployment
OSFP connectors are versatile:
- Direct Attach Copper (DAC): ultra-low latency, ≤ 2–3 m.
- Active Copper (ACC): niche use, slightly longer than DAC.
- Active Optical Cable (AOC): 3–30 m, lighter than copper.
- Transceivers + SMF/MMF patching: 100 m to multi-km reach.
Key Selection Factors
- Data rate (400G vs 800G).
- Distance.
- EMI environment.
- Thermal budget.
- Compliance with IEEE, OIF, and OSFP MSA standards.
Typical Applications
- 400G leaf–spine Ethernet fabrics in cloud data centers.
- 800G AI/ML training clusters with GPU superpods.
- High-performance computing (HPC) interconnects.
- Carrier backbone routers requiring high thermal capacity.
Future Outlook
- OSFP-800G is already commercialized, with hyperscale operators deploying it in AI workloads.
- Toward OSFP-1.6T: 8 × 200G PAM4 lanes are under development.
- Co-packaged optics (CPO): could change front-panel optics, but OSFP remains relevant for modularity and upgrades.
FAQs
Q1. Is OSFP backward compatible with QSFP-DD?
A: No. They are not physically compatible. OSFP modules require OSFP cages.
Q2. How many ports fit in 1RU with OSFP?
A: Typically 32–36 ports per 1RU switch, depending on design.
Q3. What is the typical power consumption of OSFP modules?
A: About 12–16 W for 400G/800G optics.
Q4. Do OSFP modules support hot-plugging?
A: Yes. OSFP modules are hot-swappable like QSFP-DD.
Q5. Can OSFP be used for DAC cables?
A: Yes, OSFP supports DAC, AOC, and optical transceiver modules.
Q6. What signaling does OSFP use?
A: 400G OSFP = 8 × 50G PAM4; 800G OSFP = 8 × 100G PAM4.
Q7. What’s next for OSFP?
A: Roadmaps include OSFP-1.6T (8 × 200G PAM4) and eventual integration with co-packaged optics.
Conclusion
The OSFP connector is not just another pluggable—it is a strategic enabler for scaling networks to 400G, 800G, and beyond. By balancing density, thermal headroom, and signal integrity, OSFP ensures that hyperscale operators, enterprises, and HPC environments can deploy bandwidth-hungry workloads without compromise.
For engineers, the takeaway is clear: when planning for AI clusters, 800G Ethernet fabrics, or high-power optics, OSFP offers the future-proof form factor that QSFP-DD cannot always match.
Did this article help you or not? Tell us on Facebook and LinkedIn . We’d love to hear from you!
